When keeping the peace costs you your voice.
You notice what someone else needs before you notice your own answer. You agree quickly. Later, the cost catches up with you.
Does this feel familiar?
- Editing your needs to stay easy to be around.
- Agreeing before checking your time or energy.
- Reading disappointment as proof you did something wrong.
What is worth looking at.
A quick yes sometimes protects connection or avoids conflict. In a particular relationship, it also deserves a closer look: what happens when you have a preference? Your answer needs to account for the actual relationship, including safety and power.
What do I want to choose before I decide how to explain it?
One practice to begin with.
For a low-stakes request, give yourself a pause: “Let me check and get back to you.” Use the pause to choose a reasonable response. In a relationship involving harm, practical protection and support take priority.
Afterward, ask what the attempt made possible and what it cost. Your next step should respond to what happened.
Does wanting connection mean I am people-pleasing?
Wanting connection is a human need. Look at the cost of your response and whether there is room for mutual preferences.
Do I have to begin with a difficult boundary?
Begin with a manageable choice in a sufficiently safe setting. Some situations need support, planning, or protection before direct action.
Adapted from The Stuck Point, Chapters 4, 12, 17. Sources & approach.
KEEP EXPLORING
More on people-pleasing.
LETTERS FROM KARINE
Stay with the questions.
Essays on needs, patterns, and the work of building a fuller life. Plus news from the book and learning projects.
To leave a list, email karine@sulf.org.