When “good enough” never gets to be enough.
You improve the sentence, check the detail, and move the finish line. The task becomes a test of your worth.
Does this feel familiar?
- Reopening work after meeting the requirements.
- Treating feedback as a verdict on your value.
- Using comparison to decide whether you have done enough.
What is worth looking at.
A careful standard and an endless standard do different jobs. If another revision mainly promises protection from criticism, more effort alone leaves the underlying question untouched. Notice whether the work needs improvement or whether you are trying to earn permission to stop.
What does this task require, before my worth gets added to it?
One practice to begin with.
Define a reasonable finish for one piece of work. Include necessary checks. When those are complete, choose the next activity and notice the urge to reopen without automatically following it.
Afterward, ask what the attempt made possible and what it cost. Your next step should respond to what happened.
Do I need to lower every standard?
Choose standards which fit the purpose and consequences of the task. The question concerns whether further effort improves the work or keeps postponing completion.
What if criticism is possible?
Criticism remains possible. A workable response includes evaluating useful feedback while keeping your whole worth out of a single verdict.
Adapted from The Stuck Point, Chapters 4, 14, 15, 18. Sources & approach.
KEEP EXPLORING
More on perfectionism.
LETTERS FROM KARINE
Stay with the questions.
Essays on needs, patterns, and the work of building a fuller life. Plus news from the book and learning projects.
To leave a list, email karine@sulf.org.